SirAaronMason.com

Growing up with what I term a “learning deficit,” I’ve always approached challenges with a mindset geared towards overcoming deficiencies rather than viewing them as insurmountable disabilities. This mindset led me to focus my academic pursuits early on, allowing me to delve deeply into multiculturalism and develop expertise in this area. By aligning my assignments with my interests, I was able to navigate grad school more effectively, even reaching a point where I could write papers without extensive research.

Despite significant academic progress, I acknowledge that learning deficits still manifest in my professional work. Embracing these challenges, I embarked on the journey of creating the Cultural Effectiveness Training (CET) model, enlisting the support of artificial intelligence to aid in its development.

I understand that AI is a contentious topic, particularly in academic circles. However, my primary audience consists not only of academics but also of practitioners actively working with clients. The goal of the CET model is to equip clinicians with tools to navigate the complexities of cultural issues in therapy settings. To address concerns about AI, I want to clarify that the core ideas and concepts of the model are original creations. I have employed AI primarily for tasks such as editing and refining content, ensuring that the integrity of the original narrative remains intact.

As a systems thinker committed to dialectical thinking, I strive to balance the benefits and drawbacks of my actions. It is essential for me to pursue effectiveness while upholding integrity and remaining aligned with my principles and values. Transparently disclosing my use of AI is a demonstration of my commitment to integrity and accountability.

Furthermore, I am open to providing original content for most parts of the CET model upon request, reinforcing my dedication to transparency and collaboration in advancing cultural effectiveness in therapy.